WorkflowPage

ESG and energy reporting data pulls

A workflow blueprint for assembling meter reads, invoices, landlord statements, and project evidence into review-ready ESG and energy reporting packages—with permission-faithful retrieval on company data and configurable cross-platform automations for recurring submissions.

ESG and energy reporting fails in the collection step more often than in the narrative step. Teams must prove consumption, renovations, and data quality with traceable evidence. Rizmo is designed to pull the relevant signals from approved sources, highlight gaps early, and route packages through the same review gates you already use for financial reporting. It applies Rizmo’s broader model: permission-based answers across internal systems and files, plus custom workflows and automations (gap detection, routing, reviewer handoffs) that run cross-platform on the data your organization already trusts.

Trigger

The workflow starts on a calendar cadence aligned to your reporting cycle or when a new data drop arrives from a utility or landlord.

Evidence assembly

Rizmo collects the approved inputs, aligns them to the reporting structure, and flags gaps where the template expects a value but the evidence trail is incomplete—respecting folder, mailbox, and system permissions so analysts only work with data they are already entitled to access.

Approval and submission hygiene

Draft outputs remain internal until reviewers confirm both numbers and narrative claims. Sensitive disclosures stay behind explicit approval rules.

How it works

  1. 1

    Map the reporting template

    Define the rows, evidence rules, and submission deadlines for the first reporting package.

  2. 2

    Connect approved sources

    Bring invoices, meter exports, and project files into scope under existing permissions.

  3. 3

    Review gaps before narrative lock

    Route exception lists early so missing inputs do not compress the final review window.

FAQ

Does Rizmo calculate official emissions figures automatically?
Rizmo can help assemble inputs and draft calculations, but final methodology choices and sign-off should remain with qualified owners in your organization.
Can we start with one building or one fund?
Yes. Narrow pilots are usually the fastest path to prove retrieval quality and exception handling before portfolio-wide rollout.
What is the main failure mode this prevents?
It reduces the risk that a submission looks complete while critical evidence is still buried in an attachment folder or an unreturned landlord email.

At a glance

The key points from this page in four quick checks.

Best fit teams

  • Asset and sustainability teams preparing recurring landlord or investor ESG submissions.
  • Technical property teams coordinating utility invoices, submeter reads, and capex evidence.
  • Corporate functions consolidating portfolio-level energy and emissions narratives.

When the workflow fits

  • Reporting requires combining structured extracts with unstructured attachments and email confirmations.
  • Analysts spend more time finding evidence than writing the final narrative.
  • Missing or late inputs routinely compress the review window before submission deadlines.

Workflow inputs

  • Utility invoices, landlord statements, meter exports, and maintenance records your organization approves for scope.
  • Project documentation for efficiency measures, retrofits, or certifications when relevant.
  • Reporting templates, submission calendars, and data quality rules agreed with finance and sustainability leads.

Workflow outputs

  • Evidence-indexed draft tables and commentary tied back to source files.
  • Exception lists for missing months, missing meters, or inconsistent year-on-year signals.
  • Review-ready packages routed to responsible owners before external submission.

Related pages